Parties to the Case: Equitas Micro Finance Limited & Equitas Housing Finance Ltd. (“Transferor Companies”) Equitas Finance Ltd. (“Transferee Company”) Dates in a scheme of Amalgamation: A typical scheme of amalgamation provides for two dates, viz., ‘Appointed Date’ and the ‘Effective Date’. The Effective Date would be the date on which the scheme is sanctioned …
Amalgamation – Fixing Of Appointment Date And Effective Date Read More »
I. Parties to the Case: Informant 1: Actuate Business Consulting Private Limited Informant 2: Abha Kathuria Kohli (Daughter of Mr. Narendra Nath Kathuria, MD of Informant 1) AND Opposite Party: Ambika Trading & Construction Private Limited. II. Gist of the relevant provisions of the Act noted in the Case: Section 4: Abuse of …
Competition Commission Of India – Order Under Section 26(2) Of Competition Act, 2002 Read More »
I. Facts of the case: The Appellant, trading as M/s. Om Perfumery, made an application to the Registrar of Trade Marks to register a trade mark by name “RAMAYAN” with the device of crown in class 3 in respect of incense sticks (agarbattis, dhoops) and perfumeries etc., The Respondent was a dealer for sale of …
Plaintiff/ Applicant: JAYANAND JAYANT SALGAONKAR Defendants: JAYASHREE JAYANT SALGAONKAR JAYRAJ JAYANT SALGAONKAR JAYENDRA JAYANT SALGAONKAR BHARTI SALGAONKAR SHAKTI YEZDANI LALITA LAXMI SALGAONKAR SEEMA SALGAONKAR SAMARTH SALGAONKAR SIDDHI SALGAONKAR JAY GANESH NYAS TRUST Facts of the case: This case is an action for administration of the estate of the deceased Jayant Shivram Salgaonkar. The deceased had …
Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar vs. Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar & others Read More »
FACTS: The plaintiff is Rajeev Saumitra who began the business of imparting education under the banner of Paramount coaching centre in January 2005 as a sole proprietor. Defendant No.1 is the plaintiff’s wife, Neetu Singh, defendant No.2 is K.D Campus Pvt. Ltd., the One Person Company of defendant No.1 and defendant No.3 is Paramount Coaching …
I. FACTS:- A complaint was filed by the respondent against the petitioner under Section 138 of the NI Act with allegations that an amount of Rs.1,05,000/- was taken by the petitioner/accused on credit and against repayment of the said amount, three different cheques were given to him cheque (1) and (2) being of Axis Bank, …
Sridhar Sundararajan – Plaintiff Vs. Ultramarine & Pigments Limited – Defendant-1 and Rangaswamy Sampath – Defendant- 2 The Notice of Motion seeks an order against the 2nd Defendant from functioning or continuing to exercise his powers as Chairman and Managing Director of the 1st Defendant-Company. Facts: The 1st Defendant is a public limited listed Company. …
Facts of the case: Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd amalgamated with Hindustan Lever Ltd [HLL] under a scheme of amalgamation, which was sanctioned by the Court. On presentation of the certified copy of the Court’s order the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra issued a certificate of amalgamating of the two companies. The authorities under the Bombay …
Hindustan Lever & another Vs. State of Maharashtra & another Read More »
Background of the Case:This is a landmark judgment, concerning section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This Section was not in the Act as originally enacted, but came into force by virtue of an Amendment Act of 2009 with effect from 27.10.2009.The reason behind the insertion of section 66A according to the Amendment Bill …
Shreya Singhal v. Union Of India [AIR 2015 SC 1523] Read More »
The Stock Exchange, Bombay …….Appellant Versus V.S. Kandalgaonkar & Ors. ..….Respondents 1. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE: The case pertains to the Income Tax Authorities’ right to recover its dues from the defaulting members of the Stock Exchange, by claiming over the amount realized by the stock exchange through auction of the membership card of such …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4354 of 2003 Read More »
Don’t miss our future updates! Get Subscribed Today!